Pages

quarta-feira, julho 28, 2021

entropydemons: “Respecting madness did not mean uncovering an involuntary mechanism, or an...

entropydemons:

“Respecting madness did not mean uncovering an involuntary mechanism, or an accidental slide into illness, but it did mean recognizing the lower limit of human truth, a limit that was not accidental but essential. Just as death was the term of human life from a temporal point of view, so madness was the term from the point of view of animality, and just as death itself had been sanctified by Christ’s death, madness too, int is most bestial form, recieved measure of sanctity.”

— Michel Foucault, History of Madness (154, 2006 Routledge Edition)



source https://freakronedfunk.tumblr.com/post/657991038859935744

3gregor:You’re in invited to participate in…⚠️⚠️The Memetic⚠️⚠️ Hazard:Open Spike...

3gregor:

You’re in invited to participate in…

⚠️⚠️The Memetic⚠️⚠️ Hazard:Open Spike Night

Irvingham Bucksworth recites his first poem

She/It/Xs says its a 3rd Space Allusion to the classic Illusions of literature.

Memetic Hazard: Open Spike Nght.

“Rules”: create something “poetic” (I know you already are) and tag it with #cyphermeme #ParaLit and #metapoem thus linking them all together for a massive pataphysical Meta-slam of #5DPoetry event in the #Dataplex

#RealityGlitchHack the system

Please visit our channel, like and subscribe to my channel: https://youtube.com/

Also see: my WordPress page


#Quantum .Scizopgrebia



source https://freakronedfunk.tumblr.com/post/657959073328857088

sexta-feira, julho 23, 2021

lacan-psychoananalysisaspraxis:Meaning is always in some sense an approximation, a near-miss, a...

lacan-psychoananalysisaspraxis:

Meaning is always in some sense an approximation, a near-miss, a part-failure, mixing non-sense and non-communication into sense and dialogue.





If this constant sliding and hiding of meaning were true of conscious life, then we would of course never be able to speak coherently at all. If the whole of language were present to me when I spoke, then I would not be able to articulate anything at all. The ego, or consciousness, can therefore only work by repressing this turbulent activity, provisionally nailing down words on to meanings. Every now and then a word from the unconscious which I do not want insinuates itself into my discourse, and this is the famous Freudian slip of the tongue or parapraxis. But for Lacan all our discourse is in a sense a slip of the tongue: if the process of language is as slippery and ambiguous as he suggests, we can never mean precisely what we say and never say precisely what we mean. Meaning is always in some sense an approximation, a near-miss, a part-failure, mixing non-sense and non-communication into sense and dialogue.

Terry Eagleton, Literary Theory: An Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell; 2nd edition (2008)



source https://freakronedfunk.tumblr.com/post/657509120855965696